(mail and post)

Hi, Brad,

It was good seeing you at our CUIP-NSP meeting last week.  Thanks for keeping up with this reporting so regularly!

I hope I didn't overemphasize the compliance page (in that meeting or when we were working at Reavis). It's always nice to improve a school's ratings on the chart, but you don't want to let it become an obsession! :)

  But as long as you're looking into the compliance, let me drop in some maybe-helpful hints:

  *  Check the "Last Seen" and "Last Scanned" columns. If you've corrected something but it doesn't seem in the table to be recognized as fixed, it may be that the ADM01 just hasn't re-checked it since you made the corrections.

  *  And in fact, in the cell in the big table for that computer under the "Last Scanned" column, you can click on the link in the cell as a way of requesting the ADM01 to check that computer next time around.   The cell will turn yellow as a marker that this request is noted.  
   *  See Rafael's report and my comment under it, http://reporting.cuip.net/2009/11/06/school-of-entrepreneurship-week-6-3/ , for some details about the 5-digit school numbers and their use in the computer names.  The key point is just that we can be satisfied with the naming as long as (a) it looks okay to us, and (b) the computer doesn't lose the correct school-specific techco password.

Thanks, Brad!

 ==Mitch